Export limit exceeded: 389949 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 389949 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389949 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-21095 | 1 Samsung Mobile | 1 Samsung Mobile Devices | 2026-09-10 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in DNG decoder of libimagecodec.quram.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86757 | 2 Grokability, Snipeitapp | 2 Snipe-it, Snipe-it | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Snipe-IT before 8.7.0 fails to properly gate access to encrypted custom-field values in asset form templates for listbox, textarea, markdown-textarea, and date/datetime picker elements. Authenticated users with assets.edit, assets.checkin, assets.checkout, or assets.audit permissions can read plaintext encrypted custom field values by opening asset forms, bypassing the assets.view.encrypted_custom_fields permission check. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86760 | 2 Grokability, Snipeitapp | 2 Snipe-it, Snipe-it | 2026-09-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| Snipe-IT versions 8.2.0 through 8.6.x (fixed in 8.7.0) contain an incorrect authorization flaw in app/Http/Controllers/Users/UsersController::update(). The single-user edit route assigned the activated field from the request payload before evaluating the canEditAuthFields authorization gate, so an authenticated non-admin user holding the users.edit permission in the target's company scope can submit a full valid PUT request to /users/{id} and toggle the activated flag on any user, including admin and superuser accounts. Deactivating an admin locks that account out of the application until another admin or superuser re-enables it. Only the activated field is affected; username, email, password and permissions remain protected by the gate, no data is disclosed, and the API (Api\UsersController::update) and bulk-edit paths are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71640 | 2026-09-10 | N/A | ||
| An issue in ZJU-FAST-Lab EGO-Planner-v2 All versions up to commit 5c99a95880401e2599638d567abc0e240396cb42 allows unsafe vehicle motion via improper handling of expired trajectory data in the replanning pipeline | ||||
| CVE-2026-75777 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aspera Enterprise Webapps | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.5 could allow a local attacker to escape container protections due to unrestricted system calls being permitted within the container. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76059 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78569 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an incomplete denylist in the security scanner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78571 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an unguarded eval() call on attacker-controlled input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78573 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-09-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.7 could allow a remote attacker to gain administrative access due to the use of default credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71643 | 2026-09-10 | N/A | ||
| An issue in ZJU-FAST-Lab EGO-Planner-v2 All versions up to commit 5c99a95880401e2599638d567abc0e240396cb42 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the EGOReplanFSM component | ||||
| CVE-2026-18255 | 1 Redhat | 2 Quay, Quay 3 | 2026-09-10 | 7.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Quay. A user configured in GLOBAL_READONLY_SUPER_USERS is able to view robot account tokens for repositories they are not a member of, allowing an attacker with read-only superuser privileges to impersonate any robot account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45770 | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High | ||
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Starting in version 8.0.0 and prior to version 8.0.5, a Lua rule that registers too many flow variables can corrupt Lua detection state and may bypass Suricata's restricted Lua sandbox. This requires an affected Lua script/rule to be loaded. Excessive flow variables being registered may also cause Suricata to crash. Version 8.0.5 contains a fix. As a workaround, disable `security.lua.allow-rules` unless Lua rules are required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78575 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper validation of command-line arguments in the MCP stdio server configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79723 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-controlled API endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79724 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71642 | 2026-09-10 | N/A | ||
| An issue in ZJU-FAST-Lab EGO-Planner-v2 All versions up to commit 5c99a95880401e2599638d567abc0e240396cb42 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the EGOReplanFSM::checkCollisionCallback() | ||||
| CVE-2026-79725 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79742 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an incomplete environment variable blocklist. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80378 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-10 | 8.5 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80380 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-10 | 7.1 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to cross-site request forgery. | ||||