Export limit exceeded: 408623 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (408623 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-103524 | 1 Thelia | 1 Thelia | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| Thelia v2.6.0 is vulnerable to multiple stored XSS vulnerabilities within the administrative interface. User-supplied input is stored without sufficient output encoding or sanitization and is later rendered in the administrator interface and/or the web store's product pages, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution when the affected pages are viewed. The vulnerability affects multiple administrative functions including category creation and product creation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103526 | 1 Thelia | 1 Thelia | 2026-10-13 | 3.7 Low |
| In Thelia v2.6.0, both the administrative login and forgotten password endpoints return different responses for invalid usernames and incorrect passwords, allowing unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid administrator accounts. Because the endpoint also lacks rate limiting or other protections against repeated authentication attempts, username enumeration can be performed efficiently at scale. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109108 | 1 Wavlink | 1 Wl-wn530be1-a | 2026-10-13 | 9.9 Critical |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Wavlink WL-WN530BE1-A 251117. This affects the function popen of the file /cgi-bin/uploadVpn.cgi. Such manipulation of the argument Type leads to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108874 | 1 Jeecg | 2 Jeecg Boot, Jeecgboot | 2026-10-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to assign or remove department heads by calling PUT /sys/user/changeDepartChargePerson. Low-privileged attackers can supply arbitrary userId, department id, and status values to make any user a department head, widening department-scoped views, or demote existing heads. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108875 | 1 Jeecg | 2 Jeecg Boot, Jeecgboot | 2026-10-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysUserController addSysUserGroup handler that allows any authenticated user to modify user group membership. Low-privileged attackers can send POST requests with arbitrary user ids and a groupId to add any users to administrator-maintained groups without permission checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108884 | 1 Jeecg | 2 Jeecg Boot, Jeecgboot | 2026-10-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysMessageTemplateController delete handler that allows any authenticated user to delete message templates. Low-privileged attackers can obtain template ids from the unguarded list endpoint and delete shipped notification templates, causing system notices and workflow reminders to fail. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108891 | 1 Jeecg | 2 Jeecg Boot, Jeecgboot | 2026-10-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysUserController getUserDetailByUserId handler that allows any authenticated user to read other users' details. Low-privileged attackers can supply arbitrary userId values to retrieve real names, usernames, emails, phone numbers, birthdays, employee numbers, department paths and posts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21136 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smart Switch | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| Improper authorization in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.73 allows physical attackers to invoke application restore process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21137 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smart Switch | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| Path traversal in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.73 allows physical attackers to access files with Smart Switch privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21138 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smart Switch | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| Insufficient verification of data authenticity in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.73 allows physical attackers to install arbitrary applications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107203 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 2 Satellite, Foreman | 2026-10-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| An **incorrect authorization** flaw has been found in **network interface handling** in the **Foreman** package. The domain and subnet interface API checks only that the caller holds a host permission. It does not apply the search limit on that permission, so the request is answered from every interface on the domain or subnet. A low-privileged network attacker or user must already be allowed to view some hosts and to view a domain or subnet shared with other hosts. They can request that domain or subnet's interfaces. The response includes interface records of hosts they are not allowed to view. If the attacker or user is also allowed to edit some hosts, they can submit a change to one of those interfaces. The interface is then saved with that change. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93581 | 1 Otrs | 2 Otrs, Otrs Community Edition | 2026-10-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| User-controlled values are not sufficiently neutralized when included in CSV exports. Values originating from user input, including data submitted by authenticated users or received through external communication channels such as email, may be stored in fields that are later included in CSV exports. An attacker can therefore inject values beginning with spreadsheet formula characters such as =, +, -, or @. An attacker does not necessarily require an authenticated account if the affected field can be populated through an external input channel such as incoming email. When an affected CSV file is opened in spreadsheet software, the application may interpret these values as formulas instead of plain text. Depending on the spreadsheet application and its security configuration, a malicious formula may cause unintended actions, disclose information, or invoke external functionality. Exploitation may require the user opening the exported CSV file to confirm one or more security warning dialogs. The vulnerability does not execute code on the OTRS server; any additional impact occurs in the spreadsheet application used to process the exported file. This issue affects OTRS: * 7.0.X * 8.0.X * 2023.X * 2024.X * 2025.X * 2026.X before 2026.7.X Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.x and before are vulnerable. Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected | ||||
| CVE-2026-1907 | 2 Kong, Konghq | 2 Kong Enterprise Gateway, Kong Gateway | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| A SQL Injection (SQLi) affects the Kong Gateway (Enterprise and Open Source) clustering communication logic when operating in Hybrid Mode. The issue can be triggered by sending specially crafted RPC requests to the Control Plane (CP), leading to potential unauthorized database access. Leveraging the issue requires network access to the Control Plane’s clustering port and a valid client certificate and key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103527 | 1 Thelia | 1 Thelia | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| Thelia v2.6.0's Smarty templates (address.html and address-update.html) fail to properly escape double quotes in the “next” parameter, enabling reflected Cross‑Site Scripting (XSS) when an authenticated user visits the malicious link containing attacker‑controlled JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92682 | 1 Neo4j | 1 Graphql | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| In @neo4j/graphql versions from 7.0.0 up to but not including 7.6.4, the none quantifier in @authorization filters on relationships and connections is not negated when translated to Cypher, so it behaves like some. A rule such as "none of the related denied users matches the JWT subject" therefore returns exactly the records it was meant to exclude, and excludes those it was meant to return. An authenticated user whom such a rule is meant to deny can read the protected records. This is also the case for mutations, so the impact is that sensitive data could also be created and deleted by users that shouldn't have access according to the typedefs. Fixed in 7.6.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92681 | 1 Neo4j | 1 Graphql | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| In @neo4j/graphql versions up to and including 7.6.3, @authentication directives applied at the schema level or on the Query or Mutation types are silently ignored for top-level fields annotated with @cypher. Only @authentication directives placed directly on the individual fields are enforced. An application that exposes a top-level @cypher field and relies on schema-level or type-level @authentication to protect it allows unauthenticated callers to invoke the field and run the configured Cypher statement with the privileges of the GraphQL service account, which may permit reading and modifying data. Fixed in 7.6.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109316 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav-plugin-data-manager | 2026-10-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Grav Data Manager plugin 1.4.0 through 1.4.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to delete stored data files via the classic Admin integration. Attackers can send a request with the delete parameter and known data type and filename to remove files under user/data/, including form submissions, or forge requests lacking CSRF nonce checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109321 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav-plugin-login-oauth | 2026-10-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| Grav Login OAuth plugin (grav-plugin-login-oauth) before 1.4.3 provisions OAuth accounts as ordinary Grav users with a deterministic <provider>.<id> username and an unsalted MD5 hash of the provider identifier as the password, without disabling password login. Unauthenticated remote attackers who learn or guess a provider identifier can reproduce these credentials and log in, gaining administrative control of privileged accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108477 | 2 Arraytics, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Booktics, Booktics | 2026-10-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Arraytics Booktics booktics allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Booktics: from n/a through 1.0.28. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84286 | 1 Turboderp-org | 1 Exllamav3 | 2026-10-13 | N/A |
| ExLlamaV3’s EXL3 loader uses an untrusted, model-supplied index to select a CUDA kernel without first verifying that the index is within bounds. A malicious model can force the code to read and invoke an out‑of‑range function pointer, resulting in a reproducible crash. Under specific conditions involving certain host memory layouts, it may be possible for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability to achieve controlled indirect kernel dispatch during model load. | ||||