Export limit exceeded: 389827 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389827 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-88018 | 2026-09-10 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone serve s3 configured with --auth-proxy but without --auth-key allows authPairMiddleware to register any client-chosen accessKeyID with an empty ws.s3Secret. gofakes3 then verifies the request’s SigV4 signature against that same empty secret, while Server.auth passes the access key identifier as both the user and authentication value to the proxy without an independent per-identity secret. An unauthenticated network attacker can therefore choose an arbitrary access key, sign with an empty secret, and reach whatever backend the auth-proxy script resolves for that identity. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88014 | 2026-09-10 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.72.0 until 1.75.1, the archive ZIP backend method (*Fs).readZip in backend/archive/zip/zip.go accepts archive/zip.File.Name values from an untrusted central directory and exposes cleaned entry names without ensuring that they remain inside the archive namespace. Entries such as ../../etc/cron.d/evil can survive path.Clean and become Object.Remote() values that fs/sync and fs/operations use as destination-relative paths, allowing rclone copy or sync to write outside the selected destination on backends that do not independently confine the path. The non-empty root check also used strings.HasPrefix without a path boundary, so root foo could incorrectly include sibling foobar entries. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88013 | 2026-09-10 | 3.7 Low | ||
| rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.49.0 until 1.75.1, the HTTP backend attaches headers configured through --http-headers or headers= to requests in backend/http/http.go, while its fshttp.NewClient client follows redirects without a backend-specific http.Client.CheckRedirect policy. A configured remote that redirects to another host can therefore cause custom secrets such as X-Api-Key to be resent to that untrusted destination, and a same-host HTTPS-to-HTTP redirect can expose Authorization or Cookie headers in cleartext. Listing, stat, download, mount, and serve operations can trigger the leak during normal use. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88008 | 2026-09-10 | N/A | ||
| Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 2.11.26 until 2.11.57 and 3.7.13, Traefik forwards a client-supplied Connection header requesting Upgrade, the Upgrade: h2c token, and HTTP2-Settings to a shared backend. If the backend accepts h2c and returns 101 Switching Protocols, Traefik enters a raw tunnel and no longer applies routers, BasicAuth, ForwardAuth, IPAllowList, RateLimit, access logging, metrics, or tracing to later HTTP/2 requests, allowing an unauthenticated request through an unprotected route to reach protected paths on the same backend. This issue is fixed in 2.11.57 and 3.7.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87913 | 1 Aws | 1 Aws Security Agent Mcp Server | 2026-09-10 | 5.9 Medium |
| A missing S3 bucket ownership verification in the AWS Security Agent MCP server before 0.2.0 version might allow remote attackers to obtain the private source archive of a scanned workspace, including credentials and infrastructure state contained in that archive, via a pre-registered storage bucket whose name is derived from a publicly known account identifier. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.2.0. Users should also verify that the scan output bucket in their account is owned by their own account, because upgrading does not release a bucket name that a third party has already registered. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87912 | 1 Aws | 1 Aws Security Agent Plugin | 2026-09-10 | 5.9 Medium |
| A missing S3 bucket ownership verification in the AWS Security Agent plugin in Amazon aws-agents-for-devsecops before 1.1.0 might allow remote attackers to obtain the private source archive of a scanned workspace, including credentials and infrastructure state contained in that archive, via a pre-registered storage bucket whose name is derived from a publicly known account identifier. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.1.0. Users should also verify that the scan output bucket in their account is owned by their own account, because upgrading does not release a bucket name that a third party has already registered. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87464 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-10 | 9.6 Critical |
| Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-85217 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Fusion | 2026-09-10 | 8.6 High |
| A maliciously crafted add-in, when installed and executed in Autodesk Fusion Desktop, can modify persistent network proxy settings without user notification or consent. A successful exploit may allow an attacker to redirect authenticated Fusion network traffic through an attacker-controlled proxy, potentially exposing sensitive information with the current user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81046 | 2026-09-10 | 9.4 Critical | ||
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2616, contain a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Arbitrary Code Execution within the application context. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6285 | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High | ||
| Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password vulnerability in Ankaref Innovation and Technology Inc. LIBRID/LIBREF allows Password Recovery Exploitation. This issue affects LIBRID/LIBREF: from 2.01.0.2183 through 10092026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4130 | 1 Ni | 2 Systemlink, Systemlink Server | 2026-09-10 | 7.1 High |
| There is a storage of sensitive information in cleartext vulnerability in NI SystemLink. This vulnerability may allow an attacker with local access to obtain sensitive information stored by the system in the clear. This vulnerability affects NI SystemLink and NI SystemLink Server 2026 Q3 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4129 | 1 Ni | 2 Systemlink, Systemlink Server | 2026-09-10 | 8.1 High |
| There is an improper access control vulnerability in NI SystemLink that may allow an authenticated user with limited privileges to access host operating system files and directories that should be restricted. This vulnerability affects NI SystemLink and NI SystemLink Server 2026 Q3 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45747 | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High | ||
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to version 7.0.16, the Lua TLS certificate information helper could dereference NULL certificate fields when a Lua script requested certificate information for TLS traffic where some certificate fields were absent. Crafted TLS traffic processed by a deployment using affected Lua TLS scripting could crash Suricata, resulting in denial of service. Version 7.0.16 contains a fix. As a workaround, avoid Lua scripts that call TLS certificate information helpers on untrusted traffic (`TlsGetCertInfo` function), or update scripts to handle missing certificate fields where possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45519 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In screenArgsForPermissionCheckIfAny of multiple locations there is a possible risk of unauthorized access due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28671 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In updateInternal of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible expose contents of files due to a race condition. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28660 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In getAllSessions of multiple files, there is a possible confused deputy due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28653 | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| In multiple functions of rw_t3t.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28638 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In multiple functions of XmpDataParser.java, there is a possible improper data sanitization due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28633 | 2026-09-10 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| In initForUserNoTracing of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28630 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In onCreate of ContactsPickerActivity.kt, there is a possible misleading UI due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||