Search Results (3431 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-59799 1 Apache 1 Cloudstack 2026-08-27 8.8 High
Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's Two-factor authentication plugin allowing bypass of the two-factor authentication disable flow. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.18.0.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-61397 1 Apache 2 Apache Cloudstack, Cloudstack 2026-08-27 7.5 High
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's OAuth2 authentication plugin and Google OAuth integration. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.19.0.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-61398 1 Apache 1 Cloudstack 2026-08-27 9.1 Critical
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's UI while using Instance Reset Password functionality. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.15.1.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-61399 1 Apache 2 Apache Cloudstack, Cloudstack 2026-08-27 4.8 Medium
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's UI while using Lock User Functionality. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.20.0.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-50112 1 Apache 1 Cloudstack 2026-08-27 8.8 High
SSRF via Metalink Mirror URL Resolution: An authenticated tenant can register a template pointing to an attacker-controlled metalink file containing internal targets. The Secondary Storage VM will retrieve the data and persist it as a template file, which can later be downloaded through normal APIs. RCE on KVM hypervisor via NFS, Metalink files with/without Direct Downloads: An authenticated CloudStack tenant holding the default User role can execute arbitrary shell commands as root on the KVM hypervisor host that runs other tenants' VMs. This is cross-tenant root on the underlying compute, reachable via the public CloudStack API. When a User registers a VM template with directDownload=true and a URL pointing to a .metalink file, the management server fetches the metalink XML and dispatches download to the KVM agent. Inner URLs inside the metalink XML are never re-validated against the scheme allowlist. These issues affect Apache CloudStack: from 4.14.0.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-47359 1 Apache 1 Cloudstack 2026-08-27 8.8 High
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Apache CloudStack's NAS backup provider plugin. The addBackupRepository API (available since 4.20.0.0) and updateBackupRepository API (introduced in 4.22.0.0) accept unsanitized command options for the backup repository. A malicious operator account can exploit this to inject arbitrary commands that execute on the KVM hypervisor host when any account subsequently performs a backup restore. This issue affects Apache CloudStack: from 4.20.0.0 through 4.20.3.0 and from 4.21.0.0 through 4.22.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.20.3.1 or 4.22.1.1 or later, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-63044 1 Apache 1 Inlong 2026-08-27 5.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache InLong.  Any authenticated user (no admin role required) can cause the InLong Manager server to make outbound HTTP requests or TCP connections to arbitrary internal hosts and ports. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1]  https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/12130 .
CVE-2026-63043 1 Apache 1 Inlong 2026-08-27 7.5 High
Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in Apache InLong. Arbitrary file read from the Agent host filesystem. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1]  https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/12146 .
CVE-2026-63042 1 Apache 1 Inlong 2026-08-27 8.1 High
Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties vulnerability in Apache InLong. Any user who can authenticate to the manager can create, modify and delete Data Node definitions. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1]  https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/12161 .
CVE-2026-63040 1 Apache 1 Inlong 2026-08-27 8.1 High
Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties vulnerability in Apache InLong. StreamSource performs no authorization check, any authenticated user can logically delete ALL stream sources. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1]  https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/12145 .
CVE-2026-63039 1 Apache 1 Inlong 2026-08-27 9.8 Critical
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache InLong. This allows an attacker to inject the string value into the SQL statement, enabling SQL injection. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/12080 .
CVE-2026-63038 1 Apache 1 Inlong 2026-08-26 9.8 Critical
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache InLong. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary SQL code through the dbName, tableName, schemaName, and username parameters.  This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1]  https://github.com/apache/inlong/issues/12135 .
CVE-2026-63037 2 Apache, Apache Software Foundation 2 Inlong, Apache Inlong 2026-08-26 9.8 Critical
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache InLong. This appears to allow SQL injection in the ORDER BY clause against the Manager backend database. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1]  https://github.com/apache/inlong/issues/12079 .
CVE-2026-63016 1 Apache 1 Inlong 2026-08-26 5.3 Medium
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache InLong. Users could affect operational configuration or allow upload of non-official packages. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/12095 https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/11732
CVE-2026-63015 1 Apache 1 Inlong 2026-08-26 4.3 Medium
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache InLong. Non-template responsible persons can view template information. This issue affects Apache InLong: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 2.4.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/12093 https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/11732
CVE-2022-25762 3 Apache, Oracle, Redhat 3 Tomcat, Agile Product Lifecycle Management, Enterprise Linux 2026-08-25 8.6 High
If a web application sends a WebSocket message concurrently with the WebSocket connection closing when running on Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.75 or Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.20, it is possible that the application will continue to use the socket after it has been closed. The error handling triggered in this case could cause the a pooled object to be placed in the pool twice. This could result in subsequent connections using the same object concurrently which could result in data being returned to the wrong use and/or other errors.
CVE-2022-23437 4 Apache, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more 31 Xerces-j, Active Iq Unified Manager, Agile Engineering Data Management and 28 more 2026-08-25 6.5 Medium
There's a vulnerability within the Apache Xerces Java (XercesJ) XML parser when handling specially crafted XML document payloads. This causes, the XercesJ XML parser to wait in an infinite loop, which may sometimes consume system resources for prolonged duration. This vulnerability is present within XercesJ version 2.12.1 and the previous versions.
CVE-2021-45105 6 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 3 more 131 Log4j, Debian Linux, Cloud Manager and 128 more 2026-08-25 5.9 Medium
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2021-36373 3 Apache, Oracle, Redhat 33 Ant, Agile Product Lifecycle Management, Banking Trade Finance and 30 more 2026-08-25 5.5 Medium
When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected.
CVE-2021-33037 5 Apache, Debian, Mcafee and 2 more 25 Tomcat, Tomee, Debian Linux and 22 more 2026-08-25 5.3 Medium
Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.