Export limit exceeded: 390872 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4335 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-6797 | 6 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 3 more | 15 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 12 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| The ResourceLinkFactory implementation in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 did not limit web application access to global JNDI resources to those resources explicitly linked to the web application. Therefore, it was possible for a web application to access any global JNDI resource whether an explicit ResourceLink had been configured or not. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7426 | 4 Canonical, Hpe, Ntp and 1 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Hpux-ntp, Ntp and 7 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| NTP before 4.2.8p9 rate limits responses received from the configured sources when rate limiting for all associations is enabled, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (prevent responses from the sources) by sending responses with a spoofed source address. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6489 | 3 Canonical, Nettle Project, Redhat | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Nettle, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| The RSA and DSA decryption code in Nettle makes it easier for attackers to discover private keys via a cache side channel attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6794 | 6 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 3 more | 15 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 12 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| When a SecurityManager is configured, a web application's ability to read system properties should be controlled by the SecurityManager. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70, 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 the system property replacement feature for configuration files could be used by a malicious web application to bypass the SecurityManager and read system properties that should not be visible. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5824 | 3 Canonical, Libical Project, Redhat | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Libical, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| libical 1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free) via a crafted ics file. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6796 | 6 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 3 more | 16 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 13 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| A malicious web application running on Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via manipulation of the configuration parameters for the JSP Servlet. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9388 | 3 Canonical, Jasper Project, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Jasper, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-20 | 5.5 Medium |
| The ras_getcmap function in ras_dec.c in JasPer before 1.900.14 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) via a crafted image file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000050 | 4 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Jasper Project and 1 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Jasper and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| JasPer 2.0.12 is vulnerable to a NULL pointer exception in the function jp2_encode which failed to check to see if the image contained at least one component resulting in a denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2017-13082 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Freebsd and 4 more | 13 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Freebsd and 10 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA and WPA2) that supports IEEE 802.11r allows reinstallation of the Pairwise Transient Key (PTK) Temporal Key (TK) during the fast BSS transmission (FT) handshake, allowing an attacker within radio range to replay, decrypt, or spoof frames. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3616 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Libjpeg-turbo and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Libjpeg-turbo and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The cjpeg utility in libjpeg allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted file. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4323 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A directory traversal exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in an overwrite of files. A malicious server or someone with access to the network traffic can provide an invalid filename for a splash image triggering the vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2380 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent to the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A user could be convinced to enter a particular string which would then get converted incorrectly and could lead to a potential out-of-bounds read. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2377 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent by the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds write of one byte. A malicious server can send a negative content-length in response to a HTTP request triggering the vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2378 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol Pidgin. Specially crafted data sent via the server could potentially result in a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in memory corruption. A malicious server or an unfiltered malicious user can send negative length values to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5018 | 6 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 3 more | 16 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 13 more | 2025-04-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 a malicious web application was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2373 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or user can send an invalid mood to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2372 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious user, server, or man-in-the-middle attacker can send an invalid size for a file transfer which will trigger an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. This could result in a denial of service or copy data from memory to the file, resulting in an information leak if the file is sent to another user. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2374 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT MultiMX message sent via the server can result in an out-of-bounds write leading to memory disclosure and code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2370 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or man-in-the-middle attacker can send invalid data to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2371 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could cause memory corruption resulting in code execution. | ||||