Export limit exceeded: 397985 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10774 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-67626 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Angel Costa WP SEO Search wp-seo-search allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP SEO Search: from n/a through <= 1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-35981 | 1 Gallagher | 1 Command Centre | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor (CWE-359) in the Command Centre Server allows a privileged Operator to view limited personal data about a Cardholder they would not normally have permissions to view. This issue affects Command Centre Server: 9.30.1874 (MR1), 9.20.2337 (MR3), 9.10.3194 (MR6). | ||||
| CVE-2020-36839 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform administrative actions, such as adding pages to the site and/or replacing site content with malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25133 | 1 Synaccess | 1 Netbooter Np-0801du | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Synaccess netBooter NP-0801DU 7.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages with hidden form submissions to add admin users by tricking authenticated administrators into loading a malicious page. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25150 | 1 Ecessa | 2 Shieldlink Sl175ehq, Shieldlink Sl175ehq Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Ecessa ShieldLink SL175EHQ 10.7.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to add a superuser account by tricking a logged-in administrator into loading the page. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25151 | 1 Ecessa | 1 Wanworx Wvr-30 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Ecessa WANWorx WVR-30 versions before 10.7.4 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to create a new superuser account by tricking an authenticated administrator into loading the page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11341 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Simple Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and redirect all site visitors via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13436 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Appsero Helper plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'appsero_helper' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42504 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42616 | 1 Circl | 1 Vulnerability-lookup | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Some endpoints in vulnerability-lookup that modified application state (e.g. changing database entries, user data, configurations, or other privileged actions) may have been accessible via HTTP GET requests without requiring a CSRF token. This flaw leaves the application vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks: an attacker who tricks a logged-in user into visiting a malicious website could cause the user’s browser to issue GET requests that perform unintended state-changing operations in the context of their authenticated session. Because the server would treat these GET requests as valid (since no CSRF protection or POST method enforcement was in place), the attacker could exploit this to escalate privileges, change settings, or carry out other unauthorized actions without needing the user’s explicit consent or awareness. The fix ensures that all state-changing endpoints now require HTTP POST requests and include a valid CSRF token. This enforces that state changes cannot be triggered by arbitrary cross-site GET requests. This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42923 | 1 Sap | 1 Fiori | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Due to insufficient CSRF protection in SAP Fiori App Manage Work Center Groups, an authenticated user could be tricked by an attacker to send unintended request to the web server. This has low impact on integrity and no impact on confidentiality and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59099 | 1 Dormakaba | 1 Access Manager | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The Access Manager is using the open source web server CompactWebServer written in C#. This web server is affected by a path traversal vulnerability, which allows an attacker to directly access files via simple GET requests without prior authentication. Hence, it is possible to retrieve all files stored on the file system, including the SQLite database Database.sq3, containing badge information and the corresponding PIN codes. Additionally, when trying to access certain files, the web server crashes and becomes unreachable for about 60 seconds. This can be abused to continuously send the request and cause denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4375 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sparx Systems Pro Cloud Server allows Cross-Site Request Forgery to perform Session Hijacking. Cross-Site Request Forgery is present at the whole application but it can be used to change the Pro Cloud Server Configuration password. This issue affects Pro Cloud Server: earlier than 6.0.165. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64253 | 1 Wordpress | 2 Health Check & Troubleshooting, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in WordPress.org Health Check & Troubleshooting health-check allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Health Check & Troubleshooting: from n/a through <= 1.7.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7379 | 1 Asustor | 2 Adm, Datasync Center | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A security bypass vulnerability allows exploitation via Reverse Tabnabbing, a type of phishing attack where attackers can manipulate the content of the original tab, leading to credential theft and other security risks. This issue affects DataSync Center: from 1.1.0 before 1.1.0.r207, and from 1.2.0 before 1.2.0.r206. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11336 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the cs_menu page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11444 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cluevo_render_module_ui() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete modules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12003 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The WP System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_wp_system_page_content() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47935 | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in TXOne Networks StellarProtect (Legacy Mode), StellarEnforce, and Safe Lock allows an attacker to escalate their privileges in the victim’s device. The attacker needs to hijack the DLL file in advance. This issue affects StellarProtect (Legacy Mode): before 3.2; StellarEnforce: before 3.2; Safe Lock: from 3.0.0 before 3.1.1076. *Note: StellarProtect (Legacy Mode) is the new name for StellarEnforce, they are the same product. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49347 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jupitercow WP sIFR wp-sifr allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP sIFR: from n/a through <= 0.6.8.1. | ||||