| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| MLflow is an open source AI engineering platform for agents, large language models, and machine learning models. Starting in 3.3.0 and prior to 3.15.0, the unauthenticated POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{id}/test endpoint calls _validate_webhook_url() in mlflow/utils/validation.py only for the original URL while mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py follows redirects and re-resolves the hostname without pinning the validated address, allowing attackers to reach internal or cloud metadata services and receive response_status and response_body. This issue is fixed in version 3.15.0. |
| LightLLM through 1.2.0 fails to validate image_url and audio_url parameters in multimodal endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform server-side request forgery. Attackers can supply arbitrary URLs to fetch internal resources, with vision model processing disclosing content or error responses revealing internal network topology. |
| OpenClaw Windows Node through 2026.9.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the canvas.present capability that bypasses URL risk evaluation enforced by canvas.navigate. Attackers with gateway or agent access can issue canvas.present to make the node's WebView send requests to localhost, private networks, or tailnet services from the user's machine. |
| YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a syndication action through the render handler's content parameter. Attackers can target internal hosts and ports, read back fetched feed content in the rendered page, and cause feed enclosures to be downloaded into the files directory. |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19197 changing an integration URL exposed its stored credentials |
| YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make server-side GET requests by supplying an unvalidated actor URL to the Bazar abonnements sync action. Attackers can target internal hosts or cloud metadata endpoints and chain attacker-controlled outbox first/next links, with fetched responses stored as readable Bazar entries. |
| YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in validateKeyIdUrl() that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass the SSRF guard using 6to4, NAT64, or IPv4-compatible IPv6 addresses. Attackers can send a crafted Signature keyId to the public actor inbox route to reach cloud metadata, loopback services, or internal hosts. |
| YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a blind server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make arbitrary server-side requests via the idtypeannonce parameter of /api/entries/bazarlist. Because isValidURL() always returns true, attackers can supply internal URLs fetched by curl in loadURLContent() to probe internal networks and reach internal services or metadata endpoints. |
| Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Sef - AI Chatbot Platform allows Server Side Request Forgery.
This issue affects Sef - AI Chatbot Platform: before 2.1. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported. |
| GetSimple CMS is a content management system (CMS), and GetSimple CMS CE is the community edition of that CMS. Prior to version 1.5, the update handler in UpdateCE.php downloads a ZIP archive and extracts its contents into the web root without validating file types or extraction paths. Because PHP files are written into a web-accessible directory, an attacker who can cause a malicious archive to be processed achieves remote code execution as the web-server user. Entry names are also used unsafely, allowing directory traversal (../) to write files outside the intended extraction directory. This issue has been patched in version 1.5. |
| GetSimple CMS is a content management system (CMS), and GetSimple CMS CE is the community edition of that CMS. Prior to version 1.5, the update handler fetches a user-supplied URL with file_get_contents() after only format validation (FILTER_VALIDATE_URL) — there is no validation of the request destination. An attacker who can submit the form can make the server issue requests to arbitrary destinations, including internal-only services and cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254). The fetched response body is written to a web-accessible file (/Tmpfile.zip) and is not deleted when the content is not a valid ZIP, turning this into a full-read SSRF: the attacker can retrieve the response of the internal request directly. This issue has been patched in version 1.5. |
| YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger server requests by sending signed Follow activities to the public forms actor inbox route. Attackers sign requests with their own keyId while supplying internal actor URLs in the body, reaching internal hosts or cloud metadata via blind GET and POST requests. |
| YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in WebfingerService that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger HTTPS requests to internal hosts. Attackers can POST a crafted actor_handle with a numeric host and port to the abonnements view to probe internal HTTPS services and ports. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in LA-Studio LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor lastudio-element-kit allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor: from n/a through 1.6.2. |
| Server Side Request Forgery in vRealize Operations Manager API (CVE-2021-21975) prior to 8.4 may allow a malicious actor with network access to the vRealize Operations Manager API can perform a Server Side Request Forgery attack to steal administrative credentials. |
| When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 10.5 was possible to exploit for an unauthenticated attacker even on a GitLab instance where registration is disabled |
| VMware Workspace ONE UEM console 20.0.8 prior to 20.0.8.37, 20.11.0 prior to 20.11.0.40, 21.2.0 prior to 21.2.0.27, and 21.5.0 prior to 21.5.0.37 contain an SSRF vulnerability. This issue may allow a malicious actor with network access to UEM to send their requests without authentication and to gain access to sensitive information. |
| Apache Traffic Server allows redirect-limit bypass when plugins reset the retry counter, enabling SSRF amplification.
This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 8.1.11, from 9.0.0 through 9.2.14, from 10.0.0 through 10.1.3.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.15 or 10.1.4, which fix the issue. |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift Router. A user with EndpointSlice write access can exploit this vulnerability by creating a Service backed by an FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Name) EndpointSlice that resolves to a cloud metadata endpoint. This allows the router to proxy requests to the cloud metadata endpoint, leading to the disclosure of instance credentials and other sensitive metadata. This bypasses previous security measures for validating IP addresses. |
| SitemapLoader.parse_sitemap in langchain_community/document_loaders/sitemap.py applies the documented restrict_to_same_domain control only to leaf url entries. The loop over url elements filters cross-domain locations, but the loop over nested sitemap elements passes the child loc straight to self.scrape_all([loc.text], "xml"), which reaches WebBaseLoader.scrape_all and an aiohttp GET, with no domain comparison and no check for private, loopback or link-local destinations. An attacker who controls or influences an ingested sitemap can therefore point a nested sitemap entry at an internal address and make the server fetch it even when the deploying application set restrict_to_same_domain to True specifically to confine outbound requests. The fetched content is parsed and surfaces in the returned Documents, so internal responses are disclosed to the caller rather than merely requested. |
