| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The vulnerability allows attackers access to the root account without having to authenticate. Specifically, if the device is configured with the IP address of 10.10.10.10, the root user is automatically logged in. |
| Dover Fueling Solutions ProGauge MagLink LX Consoles expose an undocumented and unauthenticated target communication framework (TCF) interface on a specific port. Files can be created, deleted, or modified, potentially leading to remote code execution. |
| Soosyze CMS 2.0 allows brute-force login attacks via the /user/login endpoint due to missing rate-limiting and lockout mechanisms. An attacker can repeatedly submit login attempts without restrictions, potentially gaining unauthorized administrative access. This vulnerability corresponds to CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts. |
| iSeeQ Hybrid DVR WH-H4 1.03R contains an unauthenticated vulnerability in the get_jpeg script that allows unauthorized access to live video streams. Attackers can retrieve video snapshots from specific camera channels by sending requests to the /cgi-bin/get_jpeg endpoint without authentication. |
| DuraComm SPM-500 DP-10iN-100-MU
lacks access controls for a function that should require user authentication. This could allow an attacker to repeatedly reboot the device. |
| Password guessing limits could be bypassed when using LDAP authentication. |
| Due to missing authentication, SAP HANA 2.0 (hdbrss) allows an unauthenticated attacker to call a remote-enabled function that will enable them to view information. As a result, it has a low impact on the confidentiality but no impact on the integrity and availability of the system. |
| The SAP Internet Communication Framework does not conduct any authentication checks for features that need user identification allowing an attacker to reuse authorization tokens, violating secure authentication practices causing low impact on Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of the application. |
| In affected versions, vulnerability-lookup did not track or limit failed
One-Time Password (OTP) attempts during Two-Factor Authentication (2FA)
verification. An attacker who already knew or guessed a valid username
and password could submit an arbitrary number of OTP codes without
causing the account to be locked or generating any specific alert for
administrators.
This lack of rate-limiting and lockout on OTP failures significantly
lowers the cost of online brute-force attacks against 2FA codes and
increases the risk of successful account takeover, especially if OTP
entropy is reduced (e.g. short numeric codes, user reuse, or predictable
tokens). Additionally, administrators had no direct visibility into
accounts experiencing repeated 2FA failures, making targeted attacks
harder to detect and investigate.
The patch introduces a persistent failed_otp_attempts counter on user
accounts, locks the user after 5 invalid OTP submissions, resets the
counter on successful verification, and surfaces failed 2FA attempts in
the admin user list. This enforces an account lockout policy for OTP
brute-force attempts and improves monitoring capabilities for suspicious
2FA activity.This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0. |
| This vulnerability exists in Meon KYC solutions due to missing restrictions on the number of incorrect One-Time Password (OTP) attempts through certain API endpoints of login process. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by performing a brute force attack on OTP, which could lead to gain unauthorized access to other user accounts. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions). Affected devices do not conduct certain validations when interacting with them. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to change time of the device, which means the device could behave differently. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions). Affected devices do not conduct certain validations when interacting with them. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to manipulate the devices IP address, which means the device would not be reachable. |
| Beward N100 M2.1.6.04C014 contains an unauthenticated vulnerability that allows remote attackers to access live video streams without credentials. Attackers can directly retrieve the camera's RTSP stream by exploiting the lack of authentication in the video access mechanism. |
| Advantech ADAM-5630
has built-in commands that can be executed without authenticating the
user. These commands allow for restarting the operating system,
rebooting the hardware, and stopping the execution. The commands can be
sent to a simple HTTP request and are executed by the device
automatically, without discrimination of origin or level of privileges
of the user sending the commands. |
| Rasa Pro is a framework for building scalable, dynamic conversational AI assistants that integrate large language models (LLMs). A vulnerability has been identified in Rasa Pro where voice connectors in Rasa Pro do not properly implement authentication even when a token is configured in the credentials.yml file. This could allow an attacker to submit voice data to the Rasa Pro assistant from an unauthenticated source. This issue has been patched for audiocodes, audiocodes_stream, and genesys connectors in versions 3.9.20, 3.10.19, 3.11.7 and 3.12.6. |
| Sensitive data disclosure and manipulation due to missing authentication. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 39870, Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 39938, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41800. |
| A vulnerability in Kaiten version 57.131.12 and earlier allows attackers to bypass the PIN code authentication mechanism. The application requires users to input a 6-digit PIN code sent to their email for authorization after entering their login credentials. However, the request limiting mechanism can be easily bypassed, enabling attackers to perform a brute force attack to guess the correct PIN and gain unauthorized access to the application. |
| A low privileged remote attacker may modify the configuration of the CODESYS V3 service through a missing authentication vulnerability which could lead to full system access and/or DoS. |
| A low privileged remote attacker may modify the boot mode configuration setup of the device, leading to modification of the firmware upgrade process or a denial-of-service attack. |
| A low privileged remote attacker may modify the docker settings setup of the device, leading to a limited DoS. |
